This is the second component of the Google Jagger update discussion. The initial portion of this post discussed the overview of how and why Google wants to update its internet site ranking algorithms periodically. This report shall go over the distinct locations the Jagger update has altered in the Google algorithm. Sources at Google claim that the modifications we see are part of 3-phase update Jagger1, Jagger2 Jagger3. At the time of writing this report, we are in the completion stage of Jagger2 update. The Jagger3 update is anticipated to be rolled out more than the next couple of weeks. Jagger Update 1 The Jagger 1 update pre-shocks actually began with a string of back-link updates that began in September 2005 and continued into middle of October 2005. For additional information, we know people check out [http://www.linkedin.com/in/tylermcollins linkedin.com/in/tylermcollins]. In mid October, Google updated its PageRank database for public view. Usually updated after a quarter, the PR update always creates a stir. Dig up further on our partner essay by navigating to [http://www.surfline.com/video/featured-clips/tuamotus-magic_2362 compare tyler collins website]. If you have an opinion about data, you will likely need to compare about [http://www.surfline.com/company/bios/ tyler collins resource]. Whilst most Search engine optimisation professionals heavily play-down the significance of PR in ranking, the legacy of its value is so deep-rooted in the minds of most webmasters, that it is tough to shake it off as an insignificant ranking parameter. Jagger Update 2 It is believed that the Jagger 2 update is now comprehensive and replicated to all the information centers of Google. Even so, you may nevertheless notice some fluctuations in the rankings as things stabilize for every single update. We are now at the threshold of the 3rd phase of the Jagger update, which is expected to initiate sometime in the second week of November 2005. From what we have studied so far, Google has re-engineered several aspects of its algorithm. Amongst other aspects we will know as issues roll out, we believe it has altered the influence of the following:- 1. Value of incoming hyperlinks 2. Value of anchor text in incoming links 3. To check up additional information, please consider looking at [https://plus.google.com/ TylerCollinsSEO tyler collins site]. Content material on web page of incoming links four. Keyword repetitions in anchor text 5. Age of the incoming links 6. Nature of websites linking to you 7. Directory links 8. Speed and volume of incoming links designed 9. Worth of reciprocal hyperlinks 10. Influence of outbound links / links web page on your website 11. Sandbox effect / age of your web site, domain registration date 12. Size of your sites content material 13. Addition and frequency of fresh content update 14. Canonical / sub domains, sub-sub domains 15. Numerous domains on exact same IP numbers 16. Duplicate content on same site or on several domains 17. Over-optimization, excessive text markup 18. Irrational use of CSS We are studying a variety of aspects of the Jagger algo update and are closely monitoring the influence of adjustments in each and every of the above described parameters and many much more not mentioned here. We shall be discussing the impact of every single of these elements in the next parts of this report, which are most likely to be written when the Jagger3 update and our study of it is comprehensive. In the meanwhile, wed like to give out a word of caution If you have suffered drop in your website rankings, do not do any drastic alterations on your web site till the Jagger3 update is totally implemented and stabilized. There is a delicate balance and inter-dependence of all these parameters that can bring back your ranks once the Jagger3 update is completed..
There are no comments on this page.
Valid XHTML :: Valid CSS: :: Powered by WikkaWiki