This is the second element of the Google Jagger update discussion. To get alternative viewpoints, please consider checking out [http://www.aclweb.org/adminwiki/index.php?title=Redirecting_web-traffic_to_a_new_location image]. The first component of this post discussed the overview of how and why Google demands to update its website ranking algorithms periodically. This report shall discuss the particular locations the Jagger update has altered in the Google algorithm. Sources at Google claim that the alterations we see are component of three-phase update Jagger1, Jagger2 Jagger3. At the time of writing this post, we are in the completion stage of Jagger2 update. The Jagger3 update is anticipated to be rolled out over the next few weeks. Jagger Update 1 The Jagger 1 update pre-shocks actually started with a string of back-link updates that began in September 2005 and continued into middle of October 2005. In mid October, Google updated its PageRank database for public view. Generally updated after a quarter, the PR update always creates a stir. Whilst most Search engine optimisation professionals heavily play-down the value of PR in ranking, the legacy of its importance is so deep-rooted in the minds of most webmasters, that it is challenging to shake it off as an insignificant ranking parameter. Jagger Update 2 It is believed that the Jagger two update is now total and replicated to all the information centers of Google. However, you could nonetheless notice some fluctuations in the rankings as items stabilize for each and every update. We are now at the threshold of the 3rd phase of the Jagger update, which is anticipated to initiate sometime in the second week of November 2005. From what we have studied so far, Google has re-engineered several elements of its algorithm. Amongst other aspects we will know as items roll out, we think it has altered the impact of the following:- 1. Identify further about [http://www.edenanimationstudio.com/Admin6202/myspace-layouts-an-invaluable-tool-7/ adyawater.com] by browsing our grand portfolio. Value of incoming links two. Worth of anchor text in incoming hyperlinks 3. Content on page of incoming hyperlinks four. Keyword repetitions in anchor text five. Age of the incoming links 6. Nature of websites linking to you 7. Directory links eight. Speed and volume of incoming links produced 9. Be taught further on a related paper - Click here [http://www.imoreltd.com/blog/farraj174/myspace-layouts-an-invaluable-tool-2/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjaepc8egcg]. Value of reciprocal links 10. Influence of outbound hyperlinks / hyperlinks page on your internet site 11. Sandbox impact / age of your website, domain registration date 12. Size of your sites content 13. Addition and frequency of fresh content update 14. Canonical / sub domains, sub-sub domains 15. Numerous domains on very same IP numbers 16. Duplicate content on very same website or on multiple domains 17. More than-optimization, excessive text markup 18. Irrational use of CSS We are studying numerous elements of the Jagger algo update and are closely monitoring the effect of changes in each and every of the above pointed out parameters and a lot of much more not mentioned right here. We shall be discussing the effect of every of these aspects in the subsequent parts of this report, which are probably to be written as soon as the Jagger3 update and our study of it is comprehensive. In the meanwhile, wed like to give out a word of caution If you have suffered drop in your site rankings, do not do any drastic changes on your website till the Jagger3 update is fully implemented and stabilized. There is a delicate balance and inter-dependence of all these parameters that can bring back your ranks as soon as the Jagger3 update is completed.. Click here [http://italentos.com.br/wiki/index.php?title=Re-directing_web-traffic_to_a_new_place adya clarity resources] to read the meaning behind this belief.
There are no comments on this page.
Valid XHTML :: Valid CSS: :: Powered by WikkaWiki