Recently I wrote an article discussing the merits of using free publishing articles in your website to increase your search engine ranking. The article explained how Google loves lots of content o-n your site, how it loves that content to be regularly updated, and how you will get lots of keyword-rich content to your site, absolutely free. See http://www.divinewrite.com/Top_Ranking_Free.htm. Several days after publishing, I obtained a please help mail from Loren, a small business owner. To learn additional information, please look at: [http://www.top5seo.co.uk/dont-buy-link-emperor/ link emperor results]. Her web site is about glass artwork http://www.headchangearts.com , and she wanted some clarification o-n some of the points I produced in my previous article. Lorens questions were good ones, and the answers essential, so I thought I had publish them. Q: We have a website for glass art. From your report, I gather when I create an articles page with free reprint articles compiled by other people containing glass art sort keywords, I will get higher search engine rankings for anyone keywords? Is that right? In that case, what site comes up in the ratings? The content itself or my Home page? Also, if the article has been employed by other webmasters, will not the serps also include their version of the article? A: In reply to your first question, yes, having an articles page-with keyword-rich free re-print articles usually has the effect of boosting your rank. Google thinks highly of web sites with a great deal of helpful material, however it all boils down to whether other webmasters do aswell. If your website contains heaps of valuable content about glass art, other webmasters within the glass art subject be they vendors, marketers, or competitors will soon be willing to link to you simply because that link means to their clients a connection with you. That relationship increases their credibility since you are clearly a power in the field. Additionally it may help their particular website positioning a little as Google will see them within an expert, legitimate group of web sites even though the great things about this for your site are controversial and small. In case you wish to get new information on [http://www.top5seo.co.uk/dont-buy-link-emperor/ link emperor review], there are millions of databases you should consider pursuing. Therefore, in a roundabout way, I am saying that yes, article-based material might help your rating, but only when it increases the chance that other related internet sites will connect to yours. As to the question of which page the article itself or your house page displays browsing results, that really depends on which page has the most links to it*. When you yourself have articles which can be just THE BEST source of information in the industry, and everyones linking to it, that page will display in the search engine results. This is good because those who click on this effect are interested particularly in the content of the report. When your site features, they get the information they need, and theyll be happy. And assuming your navigation is clear and easy to use, its likely they will at the very least visit your property page. And finally, yes, if other websites have revealed the exact same article, they might exhibit in the results along side you. The same is true of the original authors website. But it is very important to remember that, generally, the site with the PR will rank highest in-the effects, and it is this site that many users will visit. You simply need to work hard-to ensure that is you! For a good example of how this works, perform a search for a really specific expression associated with the article of mine which you have certainly read. Research Google worldwide for Googles romance with material including the estimates. Youll realize that the no.1 result is truly a page o-n EzineArticles.com which contains my article. The page o-n my site DivineWrite.com containing the content just ranks no.2. This is because EzineArticles.com features a greater PR than DivineWrite.com, and over all, the key-words are considered more appropriate to the rest of-the content on the site than theyre to mine. Clearly, this implies that an excellent article may show repeatedly in the same research results, but thats ok - it simply contributes to the power of the article and the sites containing it. * Above I say that the page that shows in the outcome would be the one with links to it. There are a few complicating factors here. For instance, the writing in a link plays a large part in how successful that link is. A link to your site that says Click here or check this site out, wont would you just as much good as a link which says Glass Art revenue or glass art inventor. Therefore if a lot of people are linking to the page containing this article, however the text in their links is universal, then that page may not rank as highly as a page with fewer - more keyword-rich - links pointing to it. Naturally, this assumes that both pages are similarly well optimized for search engines and for the sam-e keywords. To get a second standpoint, consider taking a peep at: [http://www.top5seo.co.uk/dont-buy-link-emperor/ link emperor]. I know that the above is a very specific issue and the answer is full-of ifs and buts, but hopefully this trade can answer a few questions for a few people. Happy reprinting!.
There are no comments on this page.
Valid XHTML :: Valid CSS: :: Powered by WikkaWiki